Static Analysis of Rigid Pavement Runway under the Influence of Aircraft Loading by Finite Element Technique

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 P.G Student in Transportation Engineering, Civil Engineering Department, National Institute of Technology, Hamirpur (H.P.), India

2 Assistant Professor, Civil Engineering Department, National Institute of Technology, Hamirpur (H.P.), India

3 Ph.D. Scholar in Structural Engineering, Civil Engineering Department, National Institute of Technology, Hamirpur (H.P.), India

Abstract

The runway is the most crucial part of any airport infrastructure and is designed to withstand the weight and impact of large aircraft. Runways must be durable enough to resist deformation, cracking, and wear caused by constant traffic. Therefore, a lot of attention is paid to the design and construction of airport runways. This paper presents a finite element method-based modelling process for the study of a rigid pavement runway with a jointed plain concrete pavement (JPCP) and examines the various static response characteristics of the rigid pavement runway when loaded with different kinds of aircraft. A three-dimensional model of the rigid pavement runway was modelled and evaluated using non-closed form finite element method (FEM) based ANSYS software. The model has been simulated, and the resultant deflections and stresses have been evaluated while taking into consideration the impact of various types of aircraft loading and other engineering parameters. Identifying critical variables that influence the model’s various response parameters was one of the study's key findings, and the effects of each parameter had been thoroughly discussed. Furthermore, the software utilized in this work was verified by a closed-form numerical problem, and the results were in excellent agreement with earlier research findings with a maximum divergence of less than 1 percent, proving the accuracy of the program used in the present study. The rigid pavement runway model spanning 13.84 m was examined using the current modelling process. However, researchers can use the above-mentioned modelling procedure to analyze any runway pavement structure.

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1]     Blaauw SA, Maina JW, Mturi GAJ, Visser AT. Flexible pavement performance and life cycle assessment incorporating climate change impacts. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 2022;104:103203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103203.
[2]     Blaauw SA, Maina JW, Grobler LJ, Visser AT. A cumulative risk and sustainability index for pavements. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 2022;105:103221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103221.
[3]     Design DOF. Guide for Design and Construction of New Jointed Plain Concrete Pavements ( JPCPs ) 2008.
[4]     ISLAB2000. Applied Research Associates, Inc. http://www.ara.com/transportation/islab.htm. n.d.
[5]     Khazanovich L, Ioannides AM. DIPLOMAT: analysis program for bituminous and concrete pavements. Transp Res Rec 1995:52–60.
[6]     Gabriela S, Dwidarma Nataadmadja A. Rigid pavement optimization by using empirical mechanistic method and Kenpave software. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 2021;794:012013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/794/1/012013.
[7]     Shafabakhsh GA, Vafaei M, Amiri N, Famili A. Dynamic Effects of Moving Loads on the Jointed Plain Concrete Pavement Responses. Eng J 2017;21:137–44. https://doi.org/10.4186/ej.2017.21.5.137.
[8]     Cao P, Zhou C, Feng D, Zhao Y, Huang B. A 3D Direct Vehicle-Pavement Coupling Dynamic Model and Its Application on Analysis of Asphalt Pavement Dynamic Response. Math Probl Eng 2013;2013:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/394704.
[9]     Patil VA, Sawant VA, Deb K. 2-D finite element analysis of rigid pavement considering dynamic vehicle–pavement interaction effects. Appl Math Model 2013;37:1282–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2012.03.034.
[10]   Li M, Wang H, Xu G, Xie P. Finite element modeling and parametric analysis of viscoelastic and nonlinear pavement responses under dynamic FWD loading. Constr Build Mater 2017;141:23–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.096.
[11]   Patil VA, Sawant VA, Deb K. 3D Finite-Element Dynamic Analysis of Rigid Pavement Using Infinite Elements. Int J Geomech 2013;13:533–44. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000255.
[12]   Kim S-M, Nam JH. Measurements and Experimental Analysis of Temperature Variations in Portland Cement Concrete Pavement Systems. Road Mater Pavement Des 2010;11:745–71. https://doi.org/10.3166/rmpd.11.745-771.
[13]   Qin Y, Hiller JE. Simulating moisture distribution within concrete pavement slabs: model development and sensitivity study. Mater Struct 2014;47:351–65. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-013-0065-x.
[14]   Qin Y, Hiller JE. Modeling the temperature and stress distributions in rigid pavements: Impact of Solar Radiation absorption and heat history development. KSCE J Civ Eng 2011;15:1361–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-011-1322-6.
[15]   BOARD H. The AA. SH, O Road Test 1962.
[16]   Izquierdo JT, Agrait LR, Rĺos BC. Structural Evaluation and Analysis of Instrumented In-Service Concrete Pavements Subjected to Heavy Dynamic Loads. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 1997;1568:24–34. https://doi.org/10.3141/1568-04.
[17]   Xia R, Li J, He J, Shi D. Effect Analysis of Vehicle System Parameters on Dynamic Response of Pavement. Math Probl Eng 2015;2015:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/561478.
[18]   Chatti K, Lysmer J MC. Dynamic finite-element analysis of jointed concrete pavements. Trans. Res. 1994;1449:79–90.
[19]   Kim S-M, Won MC, Frank McCullough B. Dynamic Stress Response of Concrete Pavements to Moving Tandem-Axle Loads. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2002;1809:32–41. https://doi.org/10.3141/1809-04.
[20]   Liu C, Gazis D. Surface Roughness Effect on Dynamic Response of Pavements. J Transp Eng 1999;125:332–7. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1999)125:4(332).
[21]   Liu C, McCullough BF, Oey HS. Response of Rigid Pavements due to Vehicle-Road Interaction. J Transp Eng 2000;126:237–42. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2000)126:3(237).
[22]   Zaghloul S WT. Non-linear dynamic analysis of concrete pavements. 5th Int. Conf. on Conc. Pav. Design & Rehabilitation, Purdue University, 1993, p. 277–92.
[23]   ANSYS, ANSYS user’s Manual, ANSYS Theory Manual 2022., n.d.
[24]   Khan MI, Khan DAA, Yadav DS. Mechanistic Analysis of Rigid Pavement for Wheel Load Stresses By Finite Element Method Considering Different Sub-Grade with Different Percentage of Metal Fibre. Indian J Transp Eng 2021;1:1–9. https://doi.org/10.54105/ijte.A1901.111221.
[25]   Verma V, Nallasivam K. One-dimensional finite element analysis of thin-walled box-girder bridge. Innov Infrastruct Solut 2020;5:51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-00287-x.
[26]   Verma V, Nallasivam K. Static response of curved steel thin-walled box-girder bridge subjected to Indian railway loading. J Achiev Mater Manuf Eng 2021;108:63–74. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.5065.
[27]   Verma V, Nallasivam K. Free vibration behaviour of thin-walled concrete box-girder bridge using Perspex sheet experimental model. J Achiev Mater Manuf Eng 2021;2:56–76. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.2418.
[28]   Verma V, Malloth A, Nallasivam K. Modal Analysis of a Thin-Walled Box-Girder Bridge and Railway Track Using Finite Element Framework. Comput Eng Phys Model 2021;4:64–83. https://doi.org/10.22115/cepm.2021.278798.1165.
[29]   Khalili A, Vosoughi AR. An approach for the Pasternak elastic foundation parameters estimation of beams using simulated frequencies. Inverse Probl Sci Eng 2018;26:1079–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/17415977.2017.1377707.
[30]   Bao T, Liu Z “Leo.” Evaluation of Winkler Model and Pasternak Model for Dynamic Soil-Structure Interaction Analysis of Structures Partially Embedded in Soils. Int J Geomech 2020;20. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001519.
[31]   Liu B, Zhou Y, Gu L, Huang X. Finite Element Simulation and Multi-Factor Stress Prediction Model for Cement Concrete Pavement Considering Void under Slab. Materials (Basel) 2020;13:5294. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13225294.
[32]   Yue F. A Refined Model for Analysis of Beams on Two-Parameter Foundations by Iterative Method. Math Probl Eng 2021;2021:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5562212.
[33]   Darestani MY, Thambiratnam DP, Baweja D, Nataatmadja A. Dynamic Response of Concrete Pavements under Vehicular Loads. IABSE Symp. Budapest 2006 Responding to Tomorrow’s Challenges Struct. Eng., Zurich, Switzerland: International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE); 2006, p. 59–66. https://doi.org/10.2749/222137806796169164.
[34]   IRC 58-2015 Guidelines for Design of Plain Jointed Rigid Concrete Pavement. n.d.
[35]   Federal Aviation Administration. Airport Pavement Design and Evaluation, Advisory Circular 2021; AC 150/5320-6G, USA. n.d.
[36]   Yi-Qiu T, Yong-Kang F, Yun-Liang L, Chi Z. Responses of snow-melting airfield rigid pavement under aircraft loads and temperature loads and their coupling effects. Transp Geotech 2018;14:107–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2017.11.006.
[37]   Binesh SM. Analysis of beam on elastic foundation using the radial point interpolation method. Sci Iran 2012;19:403–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scient.2012.04.003.
[38]   IS 10262:2009 Indian Standard Concrete Mix Proportioning – Guidelines. n.d.
[39]   Xu B, Zhang W, Mei J, Yue G, Yang L. Optimization of Structure Parameters of Airfield Jointed Concrete Pavements under Temperature Gradient and Aircraft Loads. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2019;2019:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3251590.
[40]   Valašková V, Vlček J. Stress Response Analysis of Concrete Pavement Under Tire of Heavy Vehicle. Civ Environ Eng 2018;14:146–52. https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2018-0019.
[41]   Qin T, Lin M, Cao M, Fu K, Ding R. Effects of Sensor Location on Dynamic Load Estimation in Weigh-in-Motion System. Sensors 2018;18:3044. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18093044.