Application of Numerical Method in Assessing the Variations in Pile Group Efficiency under Different Circumstances

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 M.Sc. Student, Lecturer, Department of Civil Engineering, Ahsanullah University of Science and Technology (AUST), Dhaka, Bangladesh

2 M.Sc., Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Ahsanullah University of Science and Technology (AUST), Dhaka, Bangladesh

3 B.Sc., Design Engineer, JPZ Consulting Ltd. Dhaka, Bangladesh

4 B.Sc., Quality Check Engineer, SMCC-ITD JV, Dhaka, Bangladesh

5 M.Sc., Lecturer, Department of Civil Engineering, Ahsanullah University of Science and Technology (AUST), Dhaka, Bangladesh

Abstract

Rapid urbanization creates a demand to expand the cities where using pile foundation became a recurrent practice. To ensure sustainability of projects pile load tests are important but may not be always feasible in terms of costing, on-site constrains etc. In this circumstance numerical analysis is a good alternate to estimate precise pile load capacity rather than conventional conservative approaches. This research illustrates the pile group efficiency fluctuation due to pile diameter, spacing, pile number and orientation in prescribed sandy soils. Using the conventional method the individual pile capacities are calculated for a constant depth with variable diameters and soil profiles. For simulating the piles, geometric models of sandy soils with sufficient boundaries are generated in PLAXIS 3D FOUNDATION software where the parameters of pile and soil components are considered as per predetermined values from reliable references. The analysis results have thoroughly been scrutinized by plotting several graphs at different aspects. The outcomes indicate that the conventional pile spacing i.e. 2.5D to 3.5D has an insignificant effect on pile group efficiency, irrespective to pile diameter and soil type. It also exhibits that the increment of pile number significantly decreases pile group efficiency for diameters of 600mm, 800mm, 1000mm and 1200mm in sandy soils. With a few exceptions as the diameter of the pile increases, the group efficiency decreases. The arrangement of piles in group has minor impact on pile group efficiency which enhances onsite flexibility. It is expected that these outcomes will facilitate the practicing engineers for efficient solutions.

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1]     Lee KM, Xiao ZR. A simplified nonlinear approach for pile group settlement analysis in multilayered soils. Can Geotech J 2001;38:1063–80. https://doi.org/10.1139/t01-034.
[2]     Cairo R, Conte E. Settlement analysis of pile groups in layered soils. Can Geotech J 2006;43:788–801. https://doi.org/10.1139/t06-038.
[3]     Singh V, Lal SK. Analytical Method for Settlement of Axially Loaded Compressible Pile. Indian Geotech J 2012;42:75–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-012-0008-4.
[4]     Sivapriya S V., Gandhi SR. Experimental and Numerical Study on Pile Behaviour Under Lateral Load in Clayey Slope. Indian Geotech J 2013;43:105–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-012-0037-z.
[5]     Eid HT, Shehada AA. Estimating the Elastic Settlement of Piled Foundations on Rock. Int J Geomech 2015;15:04014059. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000376.
[6]     Al-Khazaali M, Vanapalli SK. Experimental Investigation of Single Model Pile and Pile Group Behavior in Saturated and Unsaturated Sand. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng 2019;145:04019112. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002176.
[7]     Vali R, Saberian M, Beygi M, Porhoseini R, Abbaspour M. Numerical Analysis of Laterally Loaded Single-Pile Behavior Affected by Urban Metro Tunnel. Indian Geotech J 2020;50:410–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-019-00375-5.
[8]     Abdolrezayi A, Khayat N. Comparative Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Piled Raft Foundations. Comput Eng Phys Model 2021;4:19–36.
[9]     Madhav MR. Efficiency of pile groups in tension. Can Geotech J 1987;24:149–53. https://doi.org/10.1139/t87-014.
[10]   Hanna AM, Morcous G, Helmy M. Efficiency of pile groups installed in cohesionless soil using artificial neural networks. Can Geotech J 2004;41:1241–9. https://doi.org/10.1139/t04-050.
[11]   Shanker K, Basudhar PK, Patra NR. Uplift Capacity of Pile Groups Embedded in Sands: Predictions and Performance. Soils Found 2006;46:605–12. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.46.605.
[12]   Taghavi A, Muraleetharan KK. Analysis of Laterally Loaded Pile Groups in Improved Soft Clay. Int J Geomech 2017;17:04016098. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000795.
[13]   Chawhan BS, Quadri SS. Experimental and Numerical Investigations of Laterally Loaded Pile Group in Multilayered Cohesionless soil. Comput Eng Phys Model 2018;1:28–45.
[14]   Yin F, Zhou H, Liu H, Chu J. Experimental and Numerical Analysis of XCC Pile-Geogrid Foundation for Existing Expressway Under Traffic Load. Int J Civ Eng 2018;16:1371–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-017-0267-7.
[15]   Gatto MPA, Montrasio L. Analysis of the Behaviour of Very Slender Piles: Focus on the Ultimate Load. Int J Civ Eng 2021;19:145–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-020-00547-y.
[16]   Comodromos EM, Anagnostopoulos CT, Georgiadis MK. Numerical assessment of axial pile group response based on load test. Comput Geotech 2003;30:505–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-352X(03)00017-X.
[17]   Küçükarslan S, Banerjee PK. Behavior of axially loaded pile group under lateral cyclic loading. Eng Struct 2003;25:303–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00152-9.
[18]   Rose AV, Taylor RN, El Naggar MH. Numerical modelling of perimeter pile groups in clay. Can Geotech J 2013;50:250–8. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2012-0194.
[19]   Banerjee S, Shirole ON. Numerical Analysis of Piles Under Cyclic Lateral Load. Indian Geotech J 2014;44:436–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-013-0092-0.
[20]   Albusoda BS, Al-Saadi AF, Jasim AF. An experimental study and numerical modeling of laterally loaded regular and finned pile foundations in sandy soils. Comput Geotech 2018;102:102–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.06.007.
[21]   Abhishek, Sharma RK. A Numerical Study of Granular Pile Anchors Subjected to Uplift Forces in Expansive Soils Using PLAXIS 3D. Indian Geotech J 2019;49:304–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-018-0333-3.
[22]   Koteswara VRP, Padavala H, Chennarapu H. Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Pile Group With and Without Building Frame Subjected to Axial Load. Indian Geotech J 2020;50:473–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-019-00383-5.
[23]   Bunyamin S, Aghayan S. Settlement Modelling of Raft Footing Founded on Oferekpe/Abakaliki Shale in South East Region of Nigeria. Comput Eng Phys Model 2018;1:68–82.
[24]   Smith IM, Griffiths DV, Margetts L. Programming the finite element method. John Wiley & Sons; 1982.
[25]   Koiter WT. General theorems for elastic plastic solids. Prog Solid Mech 1960:167–221.
[26]   Van Langen H, Vermeer PA. Automatic step size correction for non-associated plasticity problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng 1990;29:579–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620290308.
[27]   Schanz T, Vermeer PA, Bonnier PG. The hardening soil model: formulation and verification. Beyond 2000 Comput. Geotech., Routledge; 2019, p. 281–96.
[28]   Rahman SMS. Modelling deep mixing on the passive side of a deep excavation in soft soil-A pilot study to evaluate the effect of lime-cement columns on the passive side of excavation in soft soil 2020.
[29]   Fang H-Y. Foundation engineering handbook. Springer Science & Business Media; 1974.
[30]   Teng WC. Foundation Design, First Edition, India. 1981.
[31]   Table from das, 1994, 12 December 2019 n.d.
[32]   Arora KR. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Sixth Edition, Standard Publishers Distributors, Delhi-110006 n.d.
[33]   Bangladesh National Building Code (BNBC) 2006.
[34]   United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) EM 111O-1-1904.