Efficient Configuration of Storage Rack System as Per Nonlinear Static Pushover Analysis under Triangular and Uniform Pattern of Lateral Loading Pattern

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Applied Mechanics Department, Cusrow Wadia Institute of Technology Pune, Maharashtra, India

2 Professor, Structural Engineering Department, Veermata Jijabai Technological Institute, Matunga, Mumbai, India

3 Director, Maharashtra State Board of Technical Education, Bandra (East) Mumbai, India

4 Assistant Professor, Applied Mechanics, Government College of Engineering and Research, Avasari (Kd), Pune, Maharashtra, India

Abstract

The individual components of cold-formed storage rack system are most vulnerable to local and torsional buckling lateral loads in addition to under gravity. Deterministic allotment of strength and ductility in the structural components and performance evaluation of appropriate techniques is considered in the capacity based design of cold-formed pallet rack system. Nonlinear time history analysis (NTHA) and nonlinear static pushover analysis (NSPA) are most commonly followed techniques for seismic performance evaluation of any structural systems. Although, NTHA is the most correct technique of seismic demand forecasting and performance evaluation, it is computationally heavy and even requires the selection and application of relevant set of ground excitations. A simple method for the nonlinear static analysis of complicated structures subjected to gradually increasing lateral loads (pushover analysis) is presented here. This paper presents investigation of efficient configuration of conventional pallet racking system on the basis of seismic performance by using NSPA. Finite element models of two different configurations of conventional pallet racking system are prepared and analyzed on the general purpose FE platform using ABAQUS 6.12 under monotonic unidirectional lateral loads. Results show that conventional pallet racking system with horizontal and inclined bracing is more efficient as evidenced from a fair judgment of the overall displacement, base shear and yielding demands.

Highlights

Google Scholar

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

[1]     Institute RM. Specification for the design, testing, and utilization of industrial steel storage racks. Rack Manufacturers Institute; 2000.
[2]     ATC-40. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings, Report ATC-40, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, U.S.A. (1996) (also Report SSC 96-01, Seismic Safety Commission, State of California, Sacramento, U.S.A.) n.d.
[3]     Krawinkler H, Seneviratna GDPK. Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation. Eng Struct 1998;20:452–64. doi:10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00092-8.
[4]     Asawasongkram N, Chomchuen P, Premthamkorn P. Seismic performance evaluation of steel storage racks using experimental results of beam-to-column connection. 2nd Eur. Conf. Earthq. Eng. Seismol., 2014, p. 25–9.
[5]     Chopra AK, Goel RK. A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2002;31:561–82. doi:10.1002/eqe.144.
[6]     Kalkan E, Chopra AK. Modal-Pushover-Based Ground-Motion Scaling Procedure. J Struct Eng 2011;137:298–310. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000308.
[7]     Fajfar P. A Nonlinear Analysis Method for Performance-Based Seismic Design. Earthq Spectra 2000;16:573–92. doi:10.1193/1.1586128.
[8]     SANGLE KK, BAJORIA KM, TALICOTTI RS. Stability and dynamic analysis of cold-formed storage rack structures with semi rigid connections. Int J Struct Stab Dyn 2011;11:1059–88. doi:10.1142/S0219455411004476.
[9]     ANSYS, 2006 ANSYS version 8.1 On-line User’s Manual n.d.
[10]   Bajoria KM, Sangle KK, Talicotti RS. Modal analysis of cold-formed pallet rack structures with semi-rigid connections. J Constr Steel Res 2010;66:428–41. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.10.005.
[11]   Sangle KK, Bajoria KM, Talicotti RS. Elastic stability analysis of cold-formed pallet rack structures with semi-rigid connections. J Constr Steel Res 2012;71:245–62. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.11.002.
[12]   Thombare CN, Sangle KK, Mohitkar VM. Nonlinear buckling analysis of 2-D cold-formed steel simple cross-aisle storage rack frames. J Build Eng 2016;7:12–22. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2016.05.004.
[13]   Sasaki KK, Freeman SA, Paret TF. Multi-Mode Pushover Procedure (MMP)-A Method to Identify the Effects of Higher Modes in a Pushover Analysis, EERI-Sixth US. Natl. Conf. Earthq. Eng., 1998.
[14]   Kalavagunta S, Naganathan S, Mustapha KN. Pushover analysis for cold formed storage rack structures. Jordan J Civ Eng 2012;159:1–12.
[15]   Moghadam AS, Tso WK. 3-D pushover analysis for damage assessment of buildings. J Seismol Earthq Eng 2000.
[16]   Moen CD, Schafer BW. Impact of holes on the elastic buckling of cold-formed steel columns 2006.
[17]   Abaqus (2012), ABAQUS version 6.12, ABAQUS Inc. Pawtucket, RI, USA n.d.
[18]   Novoselac S, Ergić T, Baličević P. Linear and nonlinear buckling and post buckling analysis of a bar with the influence of imperfections. Teh Vjesn 2012;19:695–701.
[19]   Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA-356 (November 2000). n.d.
[20]   Uniform Building Code (UBC 1997) n.d.
[21]      Mendes-Victor LA, Oliveira CS, Azevedo J, Ribeiro A. The 1755 Lisbon Earthquake: Revisited. vol. 7. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2009. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-8609-0.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 22 March 2018
  • Revise Date: 03 July 2018
  • Accept Date: 11 July 2018
  • First Publish Date: 11 July 2018

Share

How to cite

Statistics