Static Analysis of Rigid Airfield Pavement Using Finite Element Method Vs Closed-Form Solution

Document Type : Original Article


1 PG Student of Transportation Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology (NIT) Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh, India

2 Assistant Professor of Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology (NIT) Hamirpur 177001, Himachal Pradesh, India


In addition to the geometry of runway design, a good runway should also meet the structural requirements. In this way, the analysis and design of pavement slabs need to be given more attention. The study looks at the static analysis of a 3D-modeled concrete slab resting on a subgrade foundation that is a homogeneous, isotropic elastic half-space model. This is done so that the effect of a change in Young's modulus can be compared to Winkler's reaction modulus. ANSYS's finite element software, which models the slab as a 3D element with 8 nodes and a solid 185-element type, is used to estimate the combined stresses caused by the weight of the plane and the temperature difference. Conventional slab analysis is done using modified Westergaard's allowable stress method and Eisenmann's method (warping stresses). This is because the two aircraft on the slab have different structural parameters, like the concrete's elasticity modulus, slab thickness, and temperature gradients. From both the outside and inside landing gear loading positions, the maximum values of bending tensile stress were found to go up a lot as the elastic modulus and compressive strength of concrete went up, but they went down at the same time as the thickness of the pavement slab went up. When both + and - temperature gradients were measured on the slab, the corner moved more than the centre. When it comes to stress, a positive curling temperature gradient is worse than a negative curling temperature gradient.


Main Subjects

[1]     Taheri MR, Zaman MM. Effects of a moving aircraft and temperature differential on response of rigid pavements. Comput Struct 1995;57:503–11.
[2]     Report F. FAA Finite Element Design Procedure for Rigid Pavements. Security 2007.
[3]     Patil VA, Sawant VA, Deb K. Use of finite and infinite elements in static analysis of pavement. Interact Multiscale Mech 2010;3:95–110.
[4]     Wadkar A, Mehta Y, Cleary D, Zapata A, Musumeci L, Kettleson W. Effect of Aircraft Gear Positions and Gear Configurations on Load Transfer Efficiency of Airfield Rigid Pavement Joints. Road Pavement Mater. Charact. Model. Maint., Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2011, p. 40–8.
[5]     Cai J, Wong LNY, Yan HW. Dynamic Response of Airport Concrete Pavement to Impact Loading. Adv Mater Res 2012;594–597:1395–401.
[7]     Shafabakhsh G, Kashi E, Tahani M. Analysis of runway pavement response under aircraft moving load by FEM. J Eng Des Technol 2018;16:233–43.
[8]     Rezaei-Tarahomi A, Kaya O, Ceylan H, Kim S, Gopalakrishnan K, Brill DR. Development of rapid three-dimensional finite-element based rigid airfield pavement foundation response and moduli prediction models. Transp Geotech 2017;13:81–91.
[9]     Yi-Qiu T, Yong-Kang F, Yun-Liang L, Chi Z. Responses of snow-melting airfield rigid pavement under aircraft loads and temperature loads and their coupling effects. Transp Geotech 2018;14:107–16.
[10]   Xu B, Zhang W, Mei J, Yue G, Yang L. Optimization of Structure Parameters of Airfield Jointed Concrete Pavements under Temperature Gradient and Aircraft Loads. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2019;2019:1–11.
[11]   Liu P, Wang C, Lu W, Moharekpour M, Oeser M, Wang D. Development of an FEM-DEM Model to Investigate Preliminary Compaction of Asphalt Pavements. Buildings 2022;12:932.
[12]   Rezazadeh Eidgahee D, Jahangir H, Solatifar N, Fakharian P, Rezaeemanesh M. Data-driven estimation models of asphalt mixtures dynamic modulus using ANN, GP and combinatorial GMDH approaches. Neural Comput Appl 2022;34:17289–314.
[13]   Zhao Y, Jiang J, Zhou L, Ni F. Improving the calculation accuracy of FEM for asphalt mixtures in simulation of SCB test considering the mesostructure characteristics. Int J Pavement Eng 2022;23:80–94.
[14]     Ge H, Quezada JC, Houerou V Le, Chazallon C. Multiscale analysis of tire and asphalt pavement interaction via coupling FEM–DEM simulation. Eng Struct 2022;256:113925.