Steel Plate Shear Wall with Different Infill Steel Plates

Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Arkansas, USA

2 Department of Civil Engineering, Kish International Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kish Island, Iran

3 Young Researchers Club, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran

4 Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran

Abstract

The steel plate shear wall (SPSW) system is one of the most common and acceptable lateral-resisting structural systems for steel structures. Although the advantages of SPSW over the other structural systems are somehow well-known, the wall-farm interaction of the system is not comprehensively investigated. Therefore, the present study aims at investigating the interaction of the infill steel walls and the moment frames with RBS beams, using finite element method. For this purpose, different finite element model of SPSWs with various span lengths and infill steel plates are developed. The models have the low-yield, medium-yield, and high-strength infill steel plates. At first, eigenvalue buckling analysis is accomplished and those buckling mode shapes were used to introduce the initial imperfection for a realistic simulation. In the study, the important seismic parameters−including the lateral stiffness, the ultimate shear capacity, energy absorption, and ductility−are investigated using nonlinear pushover analysis.  Finite element results of the study indicate utilizing the low-yield steel plate affects inversely the contribution to the wall-frame interaction and reduces significantly the shear capacity of SPSWs. However, using high-strength structural steel plate enhances the shear capacity. Moreover, using infill steel plates with different properties does not change the initial elastic stiffness of the shear wall. Additionally, increasing the span length of steel plate shear wall, the ultimate shear strength and energy dissipation increase significantly, but the ductility of the system decreases.

Highlights

Google Scholar

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

[1] Rafael sabelli., Michel Bruneau. (2006).  AISC Design Guide 20 – Steel plate shear walls. American inistitute os steel construction, Inc.
[2] Vian D, Bruneau M, Tsai KC, Lin YC. Special perforated steel plate shear walls with reduced beam section anchor beams. I: experimental investigation. J Struct Eng ASCE 2009;135(3):211–20.
[3] Astaneh-Asl, A., (2001). “Seismic behavior and design of steel shear walls”.Steel TIPS Report, Structural Steel Educational Council, Moraga, CA, January.
[4] Canadian Standards Association CSA. (2001). “Limit states design of steel structures.”CAN/CSA S16-01, Willowdale, Ontario.
[5] AISC (2016), Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction Inc., Chicago.
[6] Driver RG, Kulak GL, Kennedy DJL, Elwi AE. Cyclic test of four-story steel plate shear wall. J Struct Eng-ASCE 1998;124(2):112–30.
[7] Jahanpour A, Moharrami H, Aghakoochak A. Evaluation ultimate capacity of semisupported steel shear walls. J Constr Steel Res 2011;67(6):1022–30.
[8] Jahanpour A, Jönsson J, Moharrami H. Seismic behavior of semi-supported steel shear walls. J Constr Steel Res 2012;74:113–33.
[9] Alinia MM, Hosseinzadeh SAA, Habashi HR. Buckling and post-buckling strength of shear panels degraded by near border cracks. J Constr Steel Res 2008;64: 1483–94.
[10] Amiri B, AghaRezaei H, Esmaeilabadi R. The Effect of Diagonal Stiffeners on the Behaviour of Stiffened Steel Plate Shear Wall. Journal of Computational Engineering and Physical Modeling. 2018 Jan 1;1(1):58-67.
[11] Q. Zhao, A. Astaneh-Asl, Cyclic behavior of traditional and innovative composite shear walls, J. Struct. Eng. ASCE 130 (2004) 271–284.
[12] Shafaei S, Ayazi A, Farahbod F. The effect of concrete panel thickness upon composite steel plate shear walls. J Constr Steel Res 2016;117:81–90.
[13] Rassouli B, Shafaei S, Ayazi A, Farahbod F. Experimental and numerical study on steel-concrete composite shear wall using light-weight concrete. J Constr Steel Res 2016;126:117–28.
[14] Ayazi A, Ahmadi H, Shafaei S. The effects of bolt spacing on composite shear wall behavior. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. Int J Civ Environ Struct Constr Archit Eng 2012;6:882–9.
[15] Shafaei S, Farahbod F, Ayazi A. Concrete Stiffened Steel Plate Shear Walls with an Unstiffened Opening. Structures 12 (2017) 40–53.
[16] Shafaei S, Farahbod F, Ayazi A. The wall–frame and the steel–concrete interactions in composite shear walls. Struct Design Tall Spec Build. 2018;e1476. doi: 10.1002/tal.1476
[17] A. Arabzadeh, M. Soltani, A. Ayazi, Experimental investigation of composite shear walls under shear loadings, Thin-Walled Struct. 49 (2011) 842–854.
[18] L. Guo, R. Li, Q. Rong, S. Zhang, Cyclic behavior of SPSW and CSPSW in composite frame, J. Thin-Walled Struct. 51 (2012) 39–52.
[19] S. Shafaei, B. Rassouli, A. Ayazi, F. Farahbod. Nonlinear behavior of concrete stiffened steel plate shear wall. 7th International Conference on Seismology and Earthquake Engineering. Tehran, Iran. 18–21 May; 2015.
[20] A. Ayazi, F. Farahbod, B. Rassouli, S. Shafaei. Experimental research on concrete stiffened steel plate shear wall. 7th International Conference on Seismology and Earthquake Engineering. Tehran, Iran. 18–21 May; 2015.
[21] Sabouri ghomi,S.Ventura,Carlos E.(2005)” Shear Analysis and Design of Ductile Steel Plate Walls”. Journal of structural engineering ASCE.
[22] Berman, J.W. and Bruneau, M. 2003. Experimental investigation of light-gauge steel plate shear walls for the sesmic retrofit of building, Technical Report MCEER-03-0001, Multidisciplinary Center For Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, NY.
[23] S.A.A. Hosseinzadeh , Mohsen Tehranizadeh (2012) , “Introduction of stiffened large rectangular openings in steel plate shear walls” Journal of Constructional Steel Research 77 (2012) 180–192.
[24] Lubell, A.S., Prion, H.G.L, Ventura, C.E., and Rezaei, M., 2000, Unstiffened Steel Plate Shear Wall Performance Under Cyclice Loading., ASCE Journal of Structure Engineering., Vol. 126., No.4., pp. 453-460
[25] Habashi HR, Alinia MM. Characteristics of the wall–frame interaction in steel plate shear walls. J Constr Steel Res 2010;66:150–8.
[26] ABAQUS Analysis user’s manual, version 6.10.
Computational Engineering and Physical Modeling

Volume 1, Issue 3
Summer 2018
Pages 1-14

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 06 February 2018
  • Revise Date: 15 May 2018
  • Accept Date: 22 May 2018

Share

How to cite

Statistics