Systematic Review for Behavior of Post-Tensioned Concrete Members with Different Tendon Bonding Conditions

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Lecturer, College of Engineering, Al-Nahrain University, Iraq

2 Associate Professor, College of Engineering, Al-Nahrain University, Iraq

Abstract

The prestressed members of a post-tensioned cable are classified as either bonded or unbonded according to the tendon bonding conditions. Trials and research that interested in a discrepancy between bonded and unbonded of different kinds of prestressed concrete members were rarely reported. This investigation aims to carry out a statistical comparison between the behaviours of bonded and unbonded post-tensioned prestressed members based on Meta-Analysis. To perform this, previous experimental studies on post-tensioned concrete members are reinvestigated, and statistical analysis is conducted using Meta-Analysis based on the standardized mean difference. The findings of the prior tests trials and current synthesized statistical analysis are implemented for better understanding the action of concrete members that include both bonded and unbonded post-tensioned prestressed reinforcements. The summary total effect size is recorded as -0.09 standard deviation with -0.805 to 0.757 confident interval and the p-value is 0.821. From the statistical point of view, the result is not statistically significant and no evidence indicates to reject the null hypothesis. So, there is not any function between the flexural strength and the conditions of different tendon bonding of post-tensioned prestressed concrete members. There is a lack of experimental information and investigations about the difference between bonded and un-bonded post-tensioning prestressed members. That means additional experimental work is needed to fulfil this lack.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

[1]     318-19 Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary. 318-19 Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary. 2019. https://doi.org/10.14359/51716937.
[2]     Naaman AE. Prestressed concrete analysis and design: Fundamentals. McGraw-Hill New York; 1982.
[3]     Manalip H, Pinglot M, Lorrain M. Behavior of the Compressed Zone of Reinforced and Prestressed High-Strength Concrete Beams. Spec Publ 1994;149:209–26.
[4]     Mattock AH, Yamazaki J, Kattula BT. Comparative study of prestressed concrete beams, with and without bond. J. Proc., vol. 68, 1971, p. 116–25.
[5]     Cooke N, Park R, Yong P. Flexural Strength of Prestressed Concrete Members With Unbonded Tendons. J - Prestress Concr Inst 1981;26:52–80. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.11011981.52.81.
[6]     Hussien OF, Nasr EA. Behavior of bonded and unbonded prestressed normal and high strength concrete beams. HBRC J 2012;8:239–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2012.10.008.
[7]     Bondy KB. Two-way post-tensioned slabs with bonded tendons. PTI J 2012;8:43–8.
[8]     Kang TH-K, Wallace JW. Stresses in unbonded tendons of post-tensioned flat plate systems under dynamic excitation. PTI J 2008;61:45–59.
[9]     Warnitchai P, Pongpornsup S, Prawatwong U, Pimanmas A. Seismic Performance of Post- 2004.
[10]   Oukaili, Nazar K., Khattab MM. CRACKING AND DEFORMABILITY OF BONDED AND UNBONDED PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BEAMS UNDER MONOTONIC STATIC LOADING. Third Int. Conf. Sci. Eng. Environ., 2017, p. 190–5.
[11]   Jeevan N, Reddy HNJ, Prabhakara R. Flexural strengthening of RC beams with externally bonded (EB) techniques using prestressed and non-prestressed CFRP laminate. Asian J Civ Eng 2018;19:893–912.
[12]   Vengadeshwari RS, Reddy HNJ. Comparative investigation on effect of fibers in the flexural response of post tensioned beam. Asian J Civ Eng 2019;20:527–36.
[13]   Littell JH, Corcoran J, Pillai V. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Oxford University Press; 2008.
[14]   Rosenblad A. Introduction to Meta-Analysis by Michael Borenstein, Larry V. Hedges, Julian P.T. Higgins, Hannah R. Rothstein. Int Stat Rev 2009;77:478–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2009.00095_15.x.
[15]   Kawakami M, Ito T. Nonlinear finite element analysis of prestressed concrete members using ADINA. Comput Struct 2003;81:727–34.
[16]   Mercan B, Schultz AE, Stolarski HK. Finite element modeling of prestressed concrete spandrel beams. Eng Struct 2010;32:2804–13.
[17]   Yu H, Jeong DY. Bond between smooth prestressing wires and concrete: finite element model and transfer length analysis for pretensioned concrete crossties. Struct. Congr. 2014, 2014, p. 797–812.
[18]   Mohammed AH, Tayşi N, Nassani DE, Hussein AK. Finite element analysis and optimization of bonded post-tensioned concrete slabs. Cogent Eng 2017;4:1341288.
[19]   Nikolic Z, Mihanovic A. Non‐linear finite element analysis of post‐tensioned concrete structures. Eng Comput 1997.
[20]   Vecchio FJ, Gauvreau P, Liu K. Modeling of unbonded post-tensioned concrete beams critical in shear. ACI Struct J 2006;103:57.
[21]   Ayoub A. Nonlinear finite-element analysis of posttensioned concrete bridge girders. J Bridg Eng 2011;16:479–89.
[22]   Ellobody E, Bailey CG. Behaviour of unbonded post-tensioned one-way concrete slabs. Adv Struct Eng 2008;11:107–20.
[23]   Kang THK, Huang Y, Shin M, Lee JD, Cho AS. Experimental and numerical assessment of bonded and unbonded post-tensioned concrete members. ACI Struct J 2015;112:735–48. https://doi.org/10.14359/51688194.
[24]   Kim U, Huang Y, Chakrabarti PR, Kang THK. Modeling of post-tensioned one-way and two-way slabs with unbonded tendons. Comput Concr 2014;13:587–601.
[25]   Yang K-H, Lee Y, Joo D-B. Flexural behavior of post-tensioned lightweight concrete continuous one-way slabs. Int J Concr Struct Mater 2016;10:425–34.
[26]   Vakhshouri B. Experimental and numerical analysis of deflection of posttensioned lightweight concrete slabs. Mech Adv Mater Struct 2019;26:1849–57.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 09 October 2021
  • Revise Date: 08 March 2022
  • Accept Date: 06 April 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics