Vehicle Bridge Interaction Analysis on Concrete and Steel Curved Bridges

Document Type : Original Article


1 Research Assistant, the Bridge Engineering Software and Technology (BEST) Center, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20740 USA

2 Research Professor and Director, the Bridge Engineering Software and Technology (BEST) Center, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20740 USA

3 Associate Professor, College of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350116, China


This study investigation is intended to research the dynamic response of horizontally curved bridges under heavy vehicle loads. Most of the main factors that affect the bridge dynamic response due to moving vehicles are considered. An improved 3D grid model, based on commercial software ANSYS Mechanical APDL, is developed for the analysis of curved bridges following the 3D shear-flexibility grillage analyzing method. A simplified numeric method, considering the effect of random road roughness and its velocity term, is developed for solving the interaction problem. With the model and numerical method presented, a series of parametric studies are conducted to study the curved bridge dynamic interaction. Based on the investigation of determining factors of curve bridge dynamic interaction, the expression of the upper-bound envelop for impact factors of maximum deflection is given with different surface conditions and highway speed limits as a function of bridge fundamental frequency or bridge central angle. A study is conducted on comparing these empirical equations and serval other major design codes, comments and suggestions are then made based on the discoveries.


Main Subjects

[1]      Yang YB, Yau JD, Wu YS. Vehicle-Bridge Interaction Dynamics With Applications to High-Speed Railways. World Sci Publ Co 2004.
[2]      Marcondes J, Burgess GJ, Harichandran R, Snyder MB. Spectral Analysis of Highway Pavement Roughness. J Transp Eng 1991;117:540–9. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1991)117:5(540).
[3]      Yang Y-B, Liao S-S, Lin B-H. Impact Formulas for Vehicles Moving over Simple and Continuous Beams. J Struct Eng 1995;121:1644–50. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:11(1644).
[4]      Zhou S, Song G, Wang R, Ren Z, Wen B. Nonlinear dynamic analysis for coupled vehicle-bridge vibration system on nonlinear foundation. Mech Syst Signal Process 2017;87:259–78. doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.10.025.
[5]      Huang D. Dynamic Analysis of Steel Curved Box Girder Bridges. J Bridg Eng 2001;6:506–13. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:6(506).
[6]      Hwang E, Nowak AS. Simulation of Dynamic Load for Bridges. J Struct Eng 1991;117:1413–34. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:5(1413).
[7]      YANG Y-B, WU C-M, YAU J-D. Dynamic response of a horizontally curved beam subjected to vertical and horizontal moving loads. J Sound Vib 2001;242:519–37. doi:10.1006/jsvi.2000.3355.
[8]      Ding H, Shi K-L, Chen L-Q, Yang S-P. Dynamic response of an infinite Timoshenko beam on a nonlinear viscoelastic foundation to a moving load. Nonlinear Dyn 2013;73:285–98. doi:10.1007/s11071-013-0784-0.
[9]      Cai C, He Q, Zhu S, Zhai W, Wang M. Dynamic interaction of suspension-type monorail vehicle and bridge: Numerical simulation and experiment. Mech Syst Signal Process 2019;118:388–407. doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.08.062.
[10]    Mehmood A, Khan AA, Mehdi H. Vibration analysis of beam subjected to moving loads using finite element method. IOSR J Eng 2014;4:7–17.
[11]     Zeng Q, Yang YB, Dimitrakopoulos EG. Dynamic response of high speed vehicles and sustaining curved bridges under conditions of resonance. Eng Struct 2016;114:61–74. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.02.006.
[12]    Sennah KM, Zhang X, Kennedy JB. Impact Factors for Horizontally Curved Composite Box Girder Bridges. J Bridg Eng 2004;9:512–20. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2004)9:6(512).
[13]    Fafard M, Bennur M, Savard M. A general multi‐axle vehicle model to study the bridge‐vehicle interaction. Eng Comput 1997;14:491–508. doi:10.1108/02644409710170339.
[14]    MARCHESIELLO S, FASANA A, GARIBALDI L, PIOMBO BAD. Dynamics of multi-span continuous straight bridges subject to multi-degrees of freedom moving vehicle excitation. J Sound Vib 1999;224:541–61. doi:10.1006/jsvi.1999.2197.
[15]    Wang T, Huang D. Cable‐Stayed Bridge Vibration due to Road Surface Roughness. J Struct Eng 1992;118:1354–74. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118:5(1354).
[16]    Liu C, Huang D, Wang T-L. Analytical dynamic impact study based on correlated road roughness. Comput Struct 2002;80:1639–50. doi:10.1016/S0045-7949(02)00113-X.
[17]    Chang D, Lee H. Impact Factors for Simple‐Span Highway Girder Bridges. J Struct Eng 1994;120:704–15. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:3(704).
[18]    AASHTO, Load Resistance and Factor Design: Bridge Design Specifications, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2017 Eighth Edition. n.d.
[19]    C. C. Fu, DESCUS II. Win-DESCUS User’s manual for Design and Analysis of Curved BOX-Girder, 2009. n.d.
Volume 4, Issue 4 - Serial Number 16
October 2021
Pages 94-108
  • Receive Date: 21 February 2021
  • Revise Date: 23 November 2021
  • Accept Date: 23 November 2021
  • First Publish Date: 23 November 2021