Determination of Environmental Impacts of Bituminous Highway’s by Life Cycle Assessment

Document Type : Original Article


1 Gazi University

2 Gazi university


Nowadays transportation is one of the most Indispensable parts of every society, which has significant effects on economics, society, and the environment. In this study; asphalt surfaced roads environmental loads using Lifecycle Assessment Analysis have been studied. This study aims to; assess environmental impacts of road construction, maintenance and its application with defining loads causes, results of the most important procedure throughout its lifecycle and suggestion resolves for critic processes in order to develop a perspective for decision-makers, managers and anyone who related to asphalt-surfaced roadways. In this paper Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) has been done in three categories (human health, ecosystem quality, and resources) using SimaPro 7.1 software. What makes this paper distinct from previous studies in road life cycle assessment is; a comprehensive analysis has been done in three main categories, which have subcategories that all the subcategories and categories analyzed with characterization, and weighting option, it is necessary to specified the most critique processes in road LCA, so that the next step to reduce the negative effects could be possible, there are no specific studies in road LCA so we did this study more specific in terms of environmental impacts details rather than just analysis 3 main categories. In the results, the resources category determined as the highest environment loads in asphalt surfaced roadways life cycle. Due to high fossil fuel affects which is one of the resources subcategories the resources category is the first impact category. Ecosystem quality and human health are respectively in the second and third places on the environmental impact.


Google Scholar


Main Subjects

[1]      Morsali S, yücel işildar  gamze. Determination of Environmental Impacts of Bituminous Highway’s by Life Cycle Assessment. Comput Eng Phys Model 2020;3:31–40. doi:10.22115/cepm.2020.209139.1074.
[2]      Ribeiro SK, Kobayashi S, Beuthe M, Gasca J, Greene D, Lee DS, et al. Transportation and its infrastructure 2007.
[3]      A group of İppc Authors. Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report Summary for Policymakers, Ipcc’s Fifth Assessment Report (Ar5). n.d.
[4]      Ay, S. Ulaştırma Sistemlerinin Çevresal Etkileri. Yildiz Teknik Üniversitesi, Inşaat Fakültesi, Ulaştirma Anabilim Dali, 34349, Beşiktaş, Istanbul, Türkiye. n.d.
[5]      Association EAP. The asphalt paving industry, a global perspective. NAPA (USA), EAPA 2011.
[6]      Facanha C, Horvath A. Evaluation of Life-Cycle Air Emission Factors of Freight Transportation. Environ Sci Technol 2007;41:7138–44. doi:10.1021/es070989q.
[7]      FEDERICI M, ULGIATI S, BASOSI R. A thermodynamic, environmental and material flow analysis of the Italian highway and railway transport systems. Energy 2008;33:760–75. doi:10.1016/
[8]      Dikmen Ç, Saraçoğlu E, Durucan Z, Durak S, Sarıoğlu K. Türkiye Çevre Durum Raporu. Yayın No: 11 2011.
[9]      Butt AA. Life cycle assessment of asphalt pavements including the feedstock energy and asphalt additives 2012.
[10]    Zolfagharian S, Nourbakhsh M, Irizarry J, Ressang A, Gheisari M. Environmental Impacts Assessment on Construction Sites. Constr. Res. Congr. 2012, Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2012, p. 1750–9. doi:10.1061/9780784412329.176.
[11]     Galatioto F, Huang Y, Parry T, Bird R, Bell M. Traffic modelling in system boundary expansion of road pavement life cycle assessment. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 2015;36:65–75. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2015.02.007.
[12]    Özdemir A. Türkiye’de demiryolu ulaşımının yaşam döngüsü analizi ve yaşam döngüsü maliyeti yöntemleri ile değerlendirilmesi 2014.