[1] Dutta SC, Roy R. A critical review on idealization and modeling for interaction among soil–foundation–structure system. Comput Struct 2002;80:1579–94. doi:10.1016/S0045-7949(02)00115-3.
[2] Gerolymos N, Gazetas G. Winkler model for lateral response of rigid caisson foundations in linear soil. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2006;26:347–61. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2005.12.003.
[3] Karapiperis K, Gerolymos N. Combined loading of caisson foundations in cohesive soil: Finite element versus Winkler modeling. Comput Geotech 2014;56:100–20. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.11.006.
[4] Prendergast LJ, Gavin K. A comparison of initial stiffness formulations for small-strain soil–pile dynamic Winkler modelling. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2016;81:27–41. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.11.006.
[5] Asakereh A, Mossafa M. Numerical Investigation of Subgrade Reaction Coefficient in Sand Soils of Bandar Abbas City. J Struct Eng Geo-Techniques 2017;7:15–26.
[6] Lopez-Querol S, Cui L, Bhattacharya S. Numerical Methods for SSI Analysis of Offshore Wind Turbine Foundations. Wind Energy Eng., Elsevier; 2017, p. 275–97. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-809451-8.00014-X.
[7] Akmadzic V, Vrdoljak A, Ramljak D. Influence of the subgrade reaction coefficient modelling on the simple 3D frame. Proc. 29th Int. DAAAM Symp. Katalinic, B.(Ed.), 2018, p. 294–8.
[8] Vesic AB. Beams on elastic subgrade and the Winkler’s hypothesis. Proc. 5th Int. Conf. SMFE, vol. 1, 1961, p. 845–51.
[9] Horvath JS. Modulus of Subgrade Reaction: New Perspective. J Geotech Eng 1983;109:1591–6. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1983)109:12(1591).
[10] Daloglu AT, Vallabhan CVG. Values of k for Slab on Winkler Foundation. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng 2000;126:463–71. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:5(463).
[11] Biot MA. Bending of an infinite beam on an elastic foundation 1937;59.
[12] Bowles LE. Foundation analysis and design, McGrow-Hill International Editions, 6th ed. McGraw-hill; 1998.